On 12/08/2015 10:45, Joshua Lock wrote: > On Wed, 2015-08-12 at 10:25 +0100, Joshua Lock wrote: >> On Wed, 2015-08-12 at 10:17 +0100, Alex J Lennon wrote: >>> We've been having a discussion on a way forward to manage patches >>> and >>> code review and would like to open this up for discussion to agree >>> a >>> way >>> forward. >> There's http://patchwork.openembedded.org/. I'm not sure who >> maintains >> it, nor if anyone uses it, but patches sent to the mailing list end >> up >> there. >> >> OOI who are "we" in this context? What benefits would a change bring? > I managed to miss both the [yocto] and [meta-raspberrypi] tags on this > mail, apologies for that. I guess that "we" are the meta-raspberrypi > maintainers.
Yes :) Andrei (maintainer) was using Gerrit but that went away for reasons outlined in the preceding email. Some visibility and control of the review process has been lost as a result and so it was suggested we kick off a conversation on what tooling to use to restore that. > Still, the patchwork instance may be an option? The meta-freescale > layers appear to be using it. Many thanks! Cheers, Alex -- _______________________________________________ yocto mailing list yocto@yoctoproject.org https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto
