Hi,
I have written the following packagegroup called packagegroup-amatek.bb for
testing purposes :
# Copyright (C) 2012-2013 Freescale Semiconductor
# Released under the MIT license (see COPYING.MIT for the terms)
DESCRIPTION = "Example package group"
LICENSE = "MIT"
LIC_FILES_CHKSUM =
"file://${COREBASE}/LICENSE;md5=3f40d7994397109285ec7b81fdeb3b58 \
file://${COREBASE}/meta/COPYING.MIT;md5=3da9cfbcb788c80a0384361b4de20420"
PR = "r5"
inherit packagegroup
PROVIDES = "${PACKAGES}"
PACKAGES += " \
${PN}-package1 \
${PN}-package2 \
"
RDEPENDS_${PN}-package1 = " \
package1-depend1 \
"
RDEPENDS_${PN}-package2 = " \
package2-depend2 \
"
PACKAGE_ARCH = "${MACHINE_ARCH}"
If in my custom image file (amatek-image) I include only
packagegroup-amatek-package1:
IMAGE_INSTALL = "packagegroup-amatek-package1"
I would expect that package2-depend2 is not installed because it is a
dependency of the package packagegroup-amatek-package2 which is not
installed.
However, bitbake amatek-image -g -u depexp shows that package2-depend2 is
installed as well:
<http://i.stack.imgur.com/xRj1E.png> enter image description here
Is this the expected behaviour?
Regards,
Roberto
--
_______________________________________________
yocto mailing list
yocto@yoctoproject.org
https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto
