These two seems unrelated. look under deploy/ipk folder and see if you have an 
ipk sounding with same name as missing package
it might be that its empty and deleted but the dependency remains

> On Jan 7, 2016, at 1:29 PM, John Schluechtermann 
> <jschluechterm...@forceamerica.com> wrote:
> 
> Some additional information in regards to this.  In the troubleshooting of it 
> I turned on the build history by adding the following to my local.conf,
>           INHERIT += “buildhistory”
>           BUILDHISTORY_COMMIT = “1”
> 
> With that added to the local.conf the image creation would complete 
> successfully, it was also repeatable if I removed it I would then get the 
> error message about the unmet dependencies, replacing it allowed the build to 
> complete.  What do I not have setup correctly?
> 
> -          John
> 
> 
> I have a custom image that I am trying to pick up and get working that was 
> setup and used by an individual no longer with the company.
> 
> The image creation is failing in the do_rootfs portion and appears to be due 
> to a package not being installed in the image.  I have verified that the 
> package is being created which it is.  I am not sure if I need to modify an 
> IMAGE_INSTALL commend in a recipe or not since I do not understand how the 
> first package (packagegroup-base-extended) is being included.
> 
> The error message that occurs is:
> 
> The following packages have unmet dependencies:
> packagegroup-base-extended : Depends: packagegroup-base-nfc but it is not 
> going to be installed
> E: Unable to correct problems, you have held broken packages.
> 
> So if I understanding this correctly it is placing the 
> packagegroup-base-extended package in the image but it for some reason cannot 
> do that with the packagegroup-base-nfc.  Is this an order issue or something 
> else.  I do not know where to look at the moment so any guidance on that 
> would be greatly appreciated.
> 
> Thanks,
> -          John
> The information contained in this message and any attachment may be 
> proprietary, confidential, and privileged or subject to the work product 
> doctrine and thus protected from disclosure. If the reader of this message is 
> not the intended recipient, or an employee or agent responsible for 
> delivering this message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified 
> that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is 
> strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please 
> notify me immediately by replying to this message and deleting it and all 
> copies and backups thereof. Thank you.
> --
> _______________________________________________
> yocto mailing list
> yocto@yoctoproject.org <mailto:yocto@yoctoproject.org>
> https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto 
> <https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto>

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail

-- 
_______________________________________________
yocto mailing list
yocto@yoctoproject.org
https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto

Reply via email to