On Feb 24, 2016 1:30 PM, "Anders Darander" <and...@chargestorm.se> wrote: > > * Andreas Müller <schnitzelt...@googlemail.com> [160223 22:38]: > > > * Khem Raj <raj.k...@gmail.com> [160130 18:07]: > > > > > >> diff --git a/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-raspberrypi.inc b/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-raspberrypi.inc > > >> index 70e8bfe..0798788 100644 > > >> --- a/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-raspberrypi.inc > > >> +++ b/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-raspberrypi.inc > > >> @@ -60,7 +60,7 @@ do_rpiboot_mkimage() { > > >> if test "x${KERNEL_IMAGETYPE}" != "xuImage" ; then > > >> if test -n "${KERNEL_DEVICETREE}"; then > > >> # Add RPi bootloader trailer to kernel image to enable DeviceTree support > > >> - ${STAGING_DIR_NATIVE}/usr/lib/rpi-mkimage/mkknlimg --dtok ${KERNEL_OUTPUT} ${KERNEL_OUTPUT} > > >> + ${STAGING_DIR_NATIVE}${libexecdir}/mkknlimg --dtok ${KERNEL_OUTPUT} ${KERNEL_OUTPUT} > > >> fi > > >> fi > > >> } > > This patch is mandatory but there was a serial with additional fixes > > send by Maciej Borzecki on Feb 2nd. I think this is worth taken into > > account. > > > > Yes, that's right. > > If the rest of the patches in that series is non-controversial, could we > have them applied? Otherwise, could we have Khem's patch applied, and > the other series rebased upon that? >
This will also make layer incompatible with jethro and older releases. So before applying this patch jethro has to branch out > We've had the master branch non-building for quite a while now... > > I'm just keen to get either of those patches applied to > meta-raspberrypi. I'd like to avoid having to use a local fork as much > as possible... > > Cheers, > Anders > > -- > Anders Darander, Senior System Architect > ChargeStorm AB / eStorm AB > -- > _______________________________________________ > yocto mailing list > yocto@yoctoproject.org > https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto
-- _______________________________________________ yocto mailing list yocto@yoctoproject.org https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto