> On 15 Mar 2016, at 23:05, Christopher Larson <kerg...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> On Tue, Mar 15, 2016 at 3:56 PM Chris Tapp <opensou...@keylevel.com 
> <mailto:opensou...@keylevel.com>> wrote:
> Should I use master or master-next to track 2.1 release progress?
> 
> master-next is rebased. I wouldn't recommend using it unless you need to test 
> something specific which is on that branch and isn't yet on master, otherwise 
> I'd wait for changes to hit master. master is volatile enough at times ;)

Thanks. Just working through an “introspection” message as we speak ;-)

Just seeing where I’m at so I can jump when 2.1 is released :-)

--

Chris Tapp
opensou...@keylevel.com
www.keylevel.com

----
You can tell you're getting older when your car insurance gets real cheap!

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail

-- 
_______________________________________________
yocto mailing list
yocto@yoctoproject.org
https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto

Reply via email to