On 27 April 2016 at 03:12, Paul Eggleton <paul.eggle...@linux.intel.com> wrote: > On Tue, 26 Apr 2016 09:39:26 Burton, Ross wrote: >> > SUMMARY = "g3log" >> > SECTION = "sek4" >> > LICENSE = "MIT" >> > LIC_FILES_CHKSUM = "file://$ >> > {COMMON_LICENSE_DIR}/MIT;md5=0835ade698e0bcf8506ecda2f7b4f302" > > This appears to be the Unlicense [1]. It's worth noting that we seem to be > missing this in our common licenses, though it's listed by SPDX [2]. As an > aside, maybe it's time for us to bring in new license files from SPDX if there > are any others like this?
Ross and I were discussing an update for this. There are a lot of new SPDX licenses and I want a day or so with this patch I'm working on because enough has changed I don't want any breakage. -b > >> This should point to the LICENSE file in the clone, and that license file >> doesn't say MIT. >> >> > DEPENDS ="boost" > > I don't think this is correct - at least I can't see any sign upstream that it > needs boost. It even claims that it needs no external libraries. > > Cheers, > Paul > > [1] http://unlicense.org/ > [2] https://spdx.org/licenses/Unlicense.html > > -- > > Paul Eggleton > Intel Open Source Technology Centre -- Elizabeth Flanagan Yocto Project Build and Release -- _______________________________________________ yocto mailing list yocto@yoctoproject.org https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto