On 2016-04-29 11:51, Paul Eggleton wrote:
On Fri, 29 Apr 2016 09:24:23 Gary Thomas wrote:
On 2016-04-29 09:16, Paul Eggleton wrote:
On Fri, 29 Apr 2016 08:06:16 Gary Thomas wrote:
On 2016-04-29 07:08, Paul Eggleton wrote:
On Fri, 29 Apr 2016 06:24:55 Gary Thomas wrote:
I used to be able to use something like this:
      VARIABLE = "xyz"

and maybe in a .bbappend use

      VARIABLE_mymachine = "xyzzy"

where 'mymachine' is in OVERRIDES, which resulted in

      VARIABLE = "xyzzy"

This doesn't seem to work the same today, what I get is

      VARIABLE = "xyz"
      VARIABLE_mymachine = "xyzzy"

Has this changed (recently)?  Why?  How to I make use of overrides?

Note: I'm using the latest Poky master (a9b503b26) updated 2016-04-28

When you say this is what you're seeing, how are you checking this?
bitbake -e ? Which part of that output are you looking at?

You *will* now see VARIABLE_mymachine in bitbake -e output even if
"mymachine" is in OVERRIDES - that's because the overridden values stay
in the datastore instead of a "finalisation" step eliminating them, in
order to allow OVERRIDES to be changed dynamically (possibly multiple
times) and still get the datastore contents you expect. That change was
made in the 2.0 release (jethro). However That should not affect the
final value of VARIABLE if "mymachine" is in OVERRIDES however. Are you
sure you are seeing what you think you're seeing? If so, is the bbappend
in fact being applied? Because if what you describe was really happening
then pretty much the entire system would be broken. I just checked a
similar case here and I see the expected results.

Yes, I am using 'bitbake -e <recipe> | grep ^VARIABLE' to look at this.

In my main recipe, I have this:
     SOME_OTHER_VARIABLE ?= "${MACHINE}"

and my .bbappend for that recipe has these lines:
     SOME_OTHER_VARIABLE_my-target-A = "something-else1"
     SOME_OTHER_VARIABLE_my-target-B = "something-else2"

and local.conf has

     MACHINE="my-target-B"

With Yocto 2.0 (Poky ceeb52a2544) I get this:
     SOME_OTHER_VARIABLE = "something-else2"
     SOME_OTHER_VARIABLE_my-target-A = "something-else1"
     SOME_OTHER_VARIABLE_my-target-B = "something-else2"

With today's (Poky a9b503b26) I get this:
     SOME_OTHER_VARIABLE = "my-target-B"
     SOME_OTHER_VARIABLE_my-target-A = "something-else1"
     SOME_OTHER_VARIABLE_my-target-B = "something-else2"

I also use this mechanism to set COMPATIBLE_MACHINE a lot and
that doesn't seem to be working the same either.

Am I doing something incorrectly (and just got away with it for years)?

n.b. If you're interested, I can share the .bb/.bbappend files
with you privately (I can't put them on the public list)

Ah, one thing... do your machine names have uppercase characters in them
(as your pseudo-examples above do)? If so that was a 2.1 change; anything
that is to be used as an override must now be lower case (so DISTRO,
MACHINE, etc.)

Indeed, my machine names do have an upper case letter in them.
Any suggestions for how to handle this (short of renaming everything which
would be a HUGE chore)?

It's no longer supported I'm afraid, BitBake's datastore is now coded to
expect lowercase for all override values. You say it's a huge chore but surely
a grep -l | xargs -n1 sed -i would do it?

If I were to rename my target (MACHINE), I'd then have to go through
and rename all of the directories in the recipes that hold machine
customizations and there are quite a few of those.  Similarly I'd
have to rework all the recipes that use the old names (with upper case
letters) to the new ones.  Not impossible, but quite a lot of work.

Short of actually renaming the target machines, I could add an additional
override (in <MACHINE>.conf) that is lowercase only and update just the
recipes to use that instead.

By experimentation, I have found that XYZ_append_<MACHINE> seems to do
the correct thing, even when <MACHINE> has upper case letters.  Maybe this
is an oversight that will be fixed?

--
------------------------------------------------------------
Gary Thomas                 |  Consulting for the
MLB Associates              |    Embedded world
------------------------------------------------------------
--
_______________________________________________
yocto mailing list
yocto@yoctoproject.org
https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto

Reply via email to