On Fri, May 20, 2016 at 12:47:40PM +0200, Herve Jourdain wrote: > Hi Andrei, Khem, > > That's what I implemented in the upcoming v2 - except for the python > checking function part. > One thing, shall I call the variable CMA_SIZE, or VC4_CMA_SIZE? > I know CMA is kind of common, but we're using this only to trigger a > parameter to the v4c overlay. > Any opinion? (in the current implementation, I went with CMA_SIZE, but I > have doubts...) >
Hint: Try to reply in line if possible. It is easier to follow the discussion in this way. I would vote for VC4_CMA_SIZE. It sounds safer. -- Andrei Gherzan
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
-- _______________________________________________ yocto mailing list yocto@yoctoproject.org https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto
