On 2017-03-06 21:56, Paul Eggleton wrote:
On Tuesday, 7 March 2017 2:28:22 AM NZDT Gary Thomas wrote:
On 2017-03-06 13:22, Burton, Ross wrote:
On 3 March 2017 at 06:39, Gary Thomas <g...@mlbassoc.com
<mailto:g...@mlbassoc.com>> wrote:
    I'm trying to build SDKs for my board, both the native style
    using populate_sdk_ext as well as including the SDK packages
    in my image.  My image includes some extended libraries of
    my own packaging (am335x-pru-support) that I need to get into
    these SDKs.  This package (via debian renaming) turns into

      libprussdrv-dbg - 2016-08-30-r0.23 - am335x-pru-support version
      2016-08-30-r0 - Debugging files libprussdrv-dev - 2016-08-30-r0.23
      - am335x-pru-support version 2016-08-30-r0 - Development files
      libprussdrv-staticdev - 2016-08-30-r0.23 - am335x-pru-support
      version 2016-08-30-r0 - Development files (St) libprussdrv1 -
      2016-08-30-r0.23 - am335x-pru-support version 2016-08-30-r0>
    On my board/image, I can get the files I need but only if I manually
    include libprussdrv-dev>
      # opkg files libprussdrv-dev | sort
      /usr/bin/pasm
      /usr/include/pruss/
      /usr/include/pruss/pruss_intc_mapping.h
      /usr/include/pruss/prussdrv.h
      /usr/lib/libprussdrv.so

    How can I get these automatically added to my SDK images?  To build
    the

    board SDK, I'm adding these packages to my image:
      CORE_IMAGE_EXTRA_INSTALL = "packagegroup-core-sdk
      packagegroup-core-standalone-sdk-target">
    I suppose I could add libprussdrv-dev to that list, but I'd like it a
    bit more automated.>
    For the native SDK, I tried adding this to local.conf:
      TOOLCHAIN_HOST_TASK_append = " nativesdk-am335x-pru-support"

    which only got me the 'pasm' tool in my sysroot, but nothing else.

If libprussdrv1 is in your image then the -dev package should be pulled
into your SDK images, assuming that you have IMAGE_FEATURES+=dev-pkgs
already.

Thanks, that did it for the embedded SDK

That shouldn't actually be necessary. IMAGE_FEATURES controls what goes into
the image, adding dev-pkgs to that is going to include those in the image, not
just the SDK. We have a SDKIMAGE_FEATURES and the default value of that
includes dev-pkgs. If libprussdrv1 is in the image and SDKIMAGE_FEATURES is at
the default (or otherwise includes dev-pkgs) I have to say I'm not sure what
would be preventing this from working.

The same should mean that standalone SDKs (populate_sdk-style) contain the
headers too.  Worse case, TOOLCHAIN_TARGET_TASK_append = "
libprussdrvi-dev".

Sadly, this still doesn't work.  With the TOOLCHAIN* line above, I get:
   ERROR: Nothing RPROVIDES 'libprussdrv1-dev'
Without it, no changes - the bits are still missing.

As with almost all variables, in TOOLCHAIN_TARGET_TASK you want the recipe-
space name of the package, not the final (post debian-renamed) name.

I tried that as well, and it got a lot farther along, but failed in
the final steps:

ERROR: uninative-tarball-1.0-r0 do_populate_sdk: Unable to install packages. Command '/build/p8701_2016-10-22/tmp/work/x86_64-nativesdk-amltdsdk-linux/uninative-tarball/1.0-r0/recipe-sysroot-native/usr/bin/opkg --volatile-cache -f /build/p8701_2016-10-22/tmp/work/x86_64-nativesdk-amltdsdk-linux/uninative-tarball/1.0-r0/opkg.conf -t /build/p8701_2016-10-22/tmp/work/x86_64-nativesdk-amltdsdk-linux/uninative-tarball/1.0-r0/temp/ipktemp/ -o /build/p8701_2016-10-22/tmp/work/x86_64-nativesdk-amltdsdk-linux/uninative-tarball/1.0-r0/sdk/image/opt/amltd/2.2+snapshot/sysroots/none --force_postinstall --prefer-arch-to-version install libprussdrv-dev' returned 255:
Collected errors:
 * opkg_prepare_url_for_install: Couldn't find anything to satisfy 
'libprussdrv-dev'.

ERROR: uninative-tarball-1.0-r0 do_populate_sdk: Function failed: 
do_populate_sdk

--
------------------------------------------------------------
Gary Thomas                 |  Consulting for the
MLB Associates              |    Embedded world
------------------------------------------------------------
--
_______________________________________________
yocto mailing list
yocto@yoctoproject.org
https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto

Reply via email to