On 2017-04-17 2:18 AM, Paul D. DeRocco wrote:
From: Bruce Ashfield [mailto:bruce.ashfi...@windriver.com]
I can't say from what you've provided why the BSP description isn't
valid, but if the kernel recipe and layers are something I
can look at,
I can debug more.
There were some changes between those releases that tweaked the kernel
meta-data processing .. and that could be the issue, but
again, I can't
say without seeing all the details.
I've attached a zip containing the stuff I've added. It also includes the
log file showing the patch errors. It also shows a log of a few thousand
identical errors from grub-efi, having to do with a 32 vs 64 mismatch. In
the past, my system has always booted via Syslinux, not Grub, so I don't
know what changed between Fido and Morty, or if Syslinux doesn't support
64-bit booting. So there's another unrelated question.
I finally got a chance to look at the layers, and I can see that the
processing code would in fact pick/generate a generic board description
and that could lead you into the failures you are seeing.
I assume you are building for MACHINE="chroma-bsp" and the linux-yocto-rt
kernel recipe ?
If you can confirm the details, and anything else, I can mock up a
recipe space BSP description that should work.
Bruce
The history is this: I originally developed this as a 32-bit OS under
Danny, then updated it with no problems to Fido. I wanted to try the x32
ABI, since the extra registers could be very useful (lots of SSE SIMD in
the application). Perhaps I should have first tried updating to Morty
without x32. I had to change some version numbers (the kernel, systemd,
Samba), and of course add the x32 tune. For Samba, I added a few layers
from OE.
--
_______________________________________________
yocto mailing list
yocto@yoctoproject.org
https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto
