Ok, I will open a bug for QA to fix this ptest comparison issue, Bug 12094. I guess this ptest bug 12081 cannot be a blocker for the release.
Best Regards Libertad G. -----Original Message----- From: Bystricky, Juro Sent: Friday, September 15, 2017 3:14 PM To: akuster808 <akuster...@gmail.com>; Cruz, Libertad <libertad.c...@intel.com>; Richard Purdie <richard.pur...@linuxfoundation.org>; yocto@yoctoproject.org; Jolley, Stephen K <stephen.k.jol...@intel.com>; Zhang, Jessica <jessica.zh...@intel.com> Cc: Cruz Alcaraz, Juan M <juan.m.cruz.alca...@intel.com>; Jordan, Robin L <robin.l.jor...@intel.com> Subject: RE: [yocto] QA cycle report for 2.2.2 rc2 I checked out 2.2_M3 2679a347c576f5411fbe802d2f6201c94036ecb2. The recipes for gzip and slang do not contain any ptest code, so that explains why the tests are missing. However, flex recipe has a code for ptest. So there is a bit of mystery left. ________________________________________ From: akuster808 [akuster...@gmail.com] Sent: Friday, September 15, 2017 1:06 PM To: Bystricky, Juro; Cruz, Libertad; Richard Purdie; yocto@yoctoproject.org; Jolley, Stephen K; Zhang, Jessica Cc: Cruz Alcaraz, Juan M; Jordan, Robin L Subject: Re: [yocto] QA cycle report for 2.2.2 rc2 On 09/15/2017 01:01 PM, Bystricky, Juro wrote: > The commit is for 2.4 M3 (5f6945f5031e1a4ca116cc1eccf4c2f9dc228547) > 2.4 does contain the ptests for gzip, slang and flex. (Although there > are some other mysteries, like sed-ptest is missing) It would seem that 2.2 > had never contained (or lost a while ago) those ptests. Thanks for looking into this. Is there any action I need to follow up on? -- _______________________________________________ yocto mailing list yocto@yoctoproject.org https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto
