Hi Richard,
We had just configured Fedora Performance Machine to run 2.4.rc3 after we had collected enough performance data for 2.5 M1 rc1. Please give us 2 days to collect 10 data points to verify this issue. [cid:image003.jpg@01D3847B.47E721D0] Hi Jose, I had configured ypperf01 (Fedora Performance Machine) to run 2.4.rc3. Please let me know if anything that concern you. [cid:image004.jpg@01D3847B.47E721D0] Thank you very much! Thanks, Yeoh Ee Peng -----Original Message----- From: Richard Purdie [mailto:richard.pur...@linuxfoundation.org] Sent: Tuesday, January 2, 2018 7:27 PM To: Yeoh, Ee Peng <ee.peng.y...@intel.com>; Cruz, Libertad <libertad.c...@intel.com>; yocto@yoctoproject.org; Lock, Joshua G <joshua.g.l...@intel.com>; Jolley, Stephen K <stephen.k.jol...@intel.com>; Zhang, Jessica <jessica.zh...@intel.com> Cc: Perez Carranza, Jose <jose.perez.carra...@intel.com>; Sangal, Apoorv <apoorv.san...@intel.com> Subject: Re: QA cycle report for 2.4.1 RC1 Hi, On Fri, 2017-12-22 at 01:40 -0800, Yeoh, Ee Peng wrote: > Enjoy viewing the full Report for 2.4.1 > RC1: https://wiki.yoctoproject.org/wiki/WW51_-_2017-12-21- > _Full_Test_Cycle_-_2.4.1_rc1 > > ======= Summary ======== > > The QA cycle for release 2.4.1 RC1 is complete. There are 5 new bugs > from which so far none of them are high. QA has 1 concern on the > performance testing. > > Performance report shows an increase of 23% build time on the eSDK in > fedora 23, bug has not been created until further investigation with > setup outside of the GDC environment. Was there any further update on this? It may be worth running the test for 2.4.0 and checking that you get the same result as we had at time of release, just to double check there isn't some other contributing cause here... Cheers, Richard
-- _______________________________________________ yocto mailing list yocto@yoctoproject.org https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto
