That's reasonable, but how would you propose that work? An analogous fix
for ptest-runner is to use ${libdir} instead of /usr/lib (leaving the
bbclass intact), but that just flips the problem if you try to run
lib32-libfoo-ptest using a 64-bit ptest-runner with default arguments (not
specifying -d /usr/lib). Alternatively, I suppose ptest-runner could look
in multiple directories by default (for example, ${libdir} and
${nonarch_libdir}, assuming they're different). Although, it almost feels
like the run-ptest scripts should really be installed to ${libexecdir}.
I'll be glad to workup a different patch, but I want to make sure I
understand the desired design.
On Fri, Feb 16, 2018 at 6:12 PM, Burton, Ross <ross.bur...@intel.com> wrote:
> On 16 February 2018 at 21:41, Kyle Russell <bkyleruss...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> ptest-runner always looks at /usr/lib, so make this arch independent.
>>
>
> I'd say the bug here is in ptest-runner. I'd expect to be able to install
> libfoo-ptest and lib32-libfoo-ptest in parallel.
>
> Ross
>
--
_______________________________________________
yocto mailing list
yocto@yoctoproject.org
https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto
