Thanks, I'll look into it. For yocto-2.5 M3 rc1 they have given as bitbake -c fetchall core-image-sato That means it is a failure.
On Tue, Mar 27, 2018, 7:52 PM Joshua Watt <jpewhac...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Tue, 2018-03-27 at 09:19 +0000, pawanKumar wrote: > > Thanks for your tip. > Can I use capital c in place of small c. > > > Not quite sure what you mean. If you are trying to do: > > bitbake -C fetchall core-image-sato > > that doesn't work anymore AFAIK. I don't think there is currently a way to > do a "force invalidate" (e.g. -f) with --runall, although TBH I'm not sure > if 'bitbake -C fetchall' did that anyway. Perhaps someone more familiar > with the recursive dependencies can chime in. > > However, I recently ran into a case where having -f apply to --runall was > useful, so I have a patch in my contrib tree to add support for it. If > that's what you're trying to do, I'm curious what the use case is? I > haven't pushed the patch to the mailing list because I'm not sure if my use > is actually valid. > > > On Fri, Mar 23, 2018, 9:20 PM Joshua Watt <jpewhac...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Fri, 2018-03-23 at 07:31 +0000, pawanKumar wrote: > > Hi team, > When I tried to run (bitbate -c fetchall) it is giving error as > "target do_fetchall is not found for image core-image-sato". > How to over come this error. > > > I believe fetchall was superseded by --runall. Try: > > bitbake --runall fetch core-image-sato > > > Regards > Pavan. > >
-- _______________________________________________ yocto mailing list yocto@yoctoproject.org https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto