On 11/11/18 1:24 PM, richard.pur...@linuxfoundation.org wrote: > On Sun, 2018-11-11 at 13:18 -0800, akuster808 wrote: >> On 11/11/18 2:21 AM, richard.pur...@linuxfoundation.org wrote: >>> On Sat, 2018-11-10 at 10:02 -0800, akuster808 wrote: >>>> On 11/10/18 8:25 AM, richard.pur...@linuxfoundation.org wrote: >>>>> On Fri, 2018-11-09 at 09:24 +0000, Jain, Sangeeta wrote: >>>>>> This is the full report for 2.6 M4 RC1: >>>>>> > https://wiki.yoctoproject.org/wiki/WW44_-_2018-10-30_-_Full_Test_Cycle_2.6_M4_RC1 >>>>> Thanks Sangeeta and team! >>>>> >>>>> Now we have the QA report for YP 2.6 M4 rc1 (Final 2.6) we need >>>>> to make >>>>> a release go or nogo decision. To do this we have the >>>>> following: >>>>> >>>>> QA Report: >>>>> https://wiki.yoctoproject.org/wiki/WW44_-_2018-10-30_-_Full_Test_Cycle_2.6_M4_RC1 >>>>> Release Criteria: >>>>> https://wiki.yoctoproject.org/wiki/Yocto_Project_v2.6_Status#Milestone_4.2FFinal_-_Target_Oct._26.2C_2018 >>>>> >>>>> We'd be happy to take representations from members and the >>>>> community to >>>>> help reach that decision. >>>> Regarding. >>>> Bug 12991 - [2.6 M4 RC1][Build-Appliance] Bitbake build- >>>> appliance- >>>> image getting failed during building image due to webkitgtk >>>> package >>>> Does it mean the Build-Appliance is non functioning ? It was >>>> broken >>>> at the Sumo release time as well. Should it be dropped as the >>>> release >>>> criteria? >>> Build-appliance is a tricky test as it tests multiple things, >>> roughly: >>> >>> * vmdk images under vmware >>> * the web browser >>> * toaster >>> * whether we can self host (build poky within poky) >>> >>> The fact the webkit recipe failed to build may be due to several >>> reasons: >>> >>> * random race type condition >>> * lack of memory in the VM >>> * phase of the moon >>> * other things >>> >>> I'm not convinced its a release blocker, or that it invalidates the >>> b-a >>> test, or that it would even reproduce. If it does reproduce that >>> would >>> be more interesting and easier to debug. >> ok, but is the b-a functional in 2.6? > It booted under VMWare, I believe the web browser was functional and it > managed a build to a point somewhere in webkitgtk which was the only > failure in the build. > > I suspect but have little evidence that the failure was a race or > system resource issue rather than a functionality problem with b-a. > Does that make b-a functional? In my view, yes, your view may vary.
Nope. I am good. If it is functional I am good with it. We can address the other issues later. thanks, Armin > > Cheers, > > Richard > > -- _______________________________________________ yocto mailing list yocto@yoctoproject.org https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto