Thanks, not sure I follow: 'SSTATEPOSTUNPACKFUNCS_remove' is not valid any more and previously only worked because there was a bug?
Also, what about running bitbake-dumpsig on the task sigdata and finding a line containing "_remove of" (and nothing else) That doesn't seem quite right... Cheers, Wolfgang ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ On Wednesday, May 29, 2019 2:27 PM, Richard Purdie <richard.pur...@linuxfoundation.org> wrote: > On Wed, 2019-05-29 at 21:17 +0000, Wolfgang Tolkien wrote: > > > Hi there, > > I'm upgrading from Yocto 2.5 to 2.7. I have a recipe that (for > > legacy reasons) builds a 32bit "-native" executable. I am disabling > > uninative by setting > > SSTATEPOSTUNPACKFUNCS_remove = "uninative_changeinterp" > > This worked well with Yocto 2.5, but with Yocto 2.7 I'm getting > > ERROR: When reparsing virtual:native:my-32bit- > > recipe_1.0.bb.do_populate_sysroot, the basehash value changed from > > <before> to <after> > > ERROR: When reparsing virtual:native:my-32bit- > > recipe_1.0.bb.do_populate_lic, the basehash value changed from > > <before> to <after> > > ERROR: my-32bit-recipe-native-1.0-r0 do_populate_sysroot: Taskhash > > mismatch <hash1> versus <hash2> for virtual:native:my-32bit- > > recipe_1.0.bb.do_populate_sysroot > > [... lots of these...] > > I suspect the reason this appeared is a bugfix in bitbake: > > http://git.yoctoproject.org/cgit.cgi/poky/commit/bitbake?id=f7f5e30667e1ad8e1ca76ee331be2843f2976bfa > > which means this removal is now correctly being accounted for in the > checksum. In your particularly case you were relying on the bug :( > > Cheers, > > Richard -- _______________________________________________ yocto mailing list yocto@yoctoproject.org https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto
