merged, thanks! On 10/15/19 2:58 PM, Alejandro Del Castillo wrote: > > > On 10/14/19 7:36 AM, Ycn aKaJoseph wrote: >> Hi, >> >> GPL-2.0-only was applied to script without previous Licences and >> GPL-2.0-or-later to those mentioning it, however I'm wondering if I >> should also add a SPDX id to the makefile ? >> >> Here's first attempt without identifier to the Makefile. > > I don't have a preference regarding adding a SPDX identifier for the > Makefile. If I don't see any comments one way or the other, I will pull > the patch in, by the end of the week. > > thanks again for taking care of this, > > Alejandro > >> On Fri, Oct 11, 2019 at 6:45 PM <richard.pur...@linuxfoundation.org >> <mailto:richard.pur...@linuxfoundation.org>> wrote: >> >> On Fri, 2019-10-11 at 15:54 +0000, Alejandro Del Castillo wrote: >> > On 10/11/19 8:51 AM, Ycn aKaJoseph wrote: >> > > Hi guys, >> > > >> > > >> https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://bugzilla.yoctoproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13528__;!fqWJcnlTkjM!4_UTkft6YvqISMi_ZyxT3nbBDdxbyllWZ59OHmmikFQqAnQ-ln7pGeLjNidedeIGY0iDgA$ >> >> <https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://bugzilla.yoctoproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13528__;!fqWJcnlTkjM!4ZugVhFkOciFucw9FbYbLCErJ647XFyLvF76MP_0Uo4F8sa51hi1GbwmPmZTisU17VqszQ$> >> >> > > < >> > > >> >> https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://bugzilla.yoctoproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13528__;!fqWJcnlTkjM!8RtsWJXbDz_l063ZSVKrRMwvQ5KGdD0lk9aSjlUW9VHM2wufITJnBuIvovQxoT0yJXu-6Q$ >> > > > >> > > >> > > I'm about to work on that bug however most of the script in opkg- >> > > utils >> > > dir are un-licenced and there's no hint for me to decide what SPDX >> > > Identifier to add. >> > >> > thanks for doing this! >> > >> > > The doubt concerns those script : >> > > makePackage >> > > opkg-build >> > > opkg-buildpackage >> > > opkg-compare-indexes >> > > opkg-diff >> > > opkg-extract-file >> > > opkg-graph-deps >> > > opkg-list-fields >> > > opkg-make-index >> > > opkg-show-deps >> > > opkg-unbuild >> > > opkg-update-index >> > > >> > > What license do you want them to carry ? >> > >> > Looking at the commit history, opkg-graph-deps was authored by Haris >> > Okanovic, and the rest by Richard Purdie (included them on the >> > thread). >> > >> > My take on it: since opkg is licensed as GPLv2+, and the files that >> > have a license in opkg-utils are GPLv2+, make sense to me to license >> > the rest as GPLv2+ too. >> >> I didn't author these, they were imported from ipkg-utils which was >> part of handhelds.org >> >> <https://urldefense.com/v3/__http://handhelds.org__;!fqWJcnlTkjM!4ZugVhFkOciFucw9FbYbLCErJ647XFyLvF76MP_0Uo4F8sa51hi1GbwmPmZTisWdWuYokA$>. >> I did modify things quite a bit during the >> import. >> >> handhelds.org >> >> <https://urldefense.com/v3/__http://handhelds.org__;!fqWJcnlTkjM!4ZugVhFkOciFucw9FbYbLCErJ647XFyLvF76MP_0Uo4F8sa51hi1GbwmPmZTisWdWuYokA$>'s >> CVS repos aren't there any more but I do have old >> sources lying around locally. I have a snapshot of the CVS repo from >> 20050930 and it has GPLv2 COPYING file (not 2+, just 2). >> >> I'd suggest we follow the original licensing of that and go with GPLv2. >> >> Cheers, >> >> Richard >> >> >> >> >
-- Cheers, Alejandro -- _______________________________________________ yocto mailing list yocto@yoctoproject.org https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto