how about joining an IRC channel, I suggest
irc://irc.freenode.net:6667/yokoKresten Krab Thorup [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Mar 6, 2006, at 8:02 PM, Sakala, Adinarayana wrote:
Hi Alan, Kresten has already committed the work related to his task.Infact, he actually closed the task, I reopened it because some more work on top of kresten's work needs to be done.What prasad is in addition to what kresten has committed.I think it probably makes sense to close YOKO-37 task as kresten has completed the initial work and create new one forprasad's work. If this is ok i will do that and assign it to prasad. thanks, adi-----Original Message----- From: Alan D. Cabrera [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, March 06, 2006 12:44 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: Initial tasks Prasad, Kresten is already working on this. Why would you re-assign this to yourself? Regards, Alan Kosuru, Prasadarao wrote, On 3/6/2006 8:23 AM:Hi Kresten, I am currently working on build framework using maven2. AlsoI'll renamethe folder 'orb' to 'core', and once I get a working copy will modifythe trunk accordingly (assuming that I get root password bythat time).So I'll re-assign the task YOKO-37 to my name. Let know if you have any comments on this. Regards, Prasad -----Original Message----- From: Kresten Krab Thorup [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 06 March 2006 08:10 To: Sakala, Adinarayana Cc: [email protected] Subject: Re: Initial tasks On Mar 3, 2006, at 6:46 PM, Sakala, Adinarayana wrote:How about if we identify the modules that we can think of now? Looking at prasad's and your proposal we atleast have fivemodules tostart with, tools, core, rmi, system_tests, distribution Each of themodule willbe a maven2 subproject which will build a yoko-<module-name>-1.0-SNAPSHOT If the above list and names sound good to you, prasad and everybody lets go with implementing that project strucutre.This looks fine; I think it's perfect to call the base system "org.apache.yoko.core" in stead of "org.apache.yoko.orb".Also, i dont see a need for generated-java directories. Thats just a redudant thing from IONA's internal build system. we can just have main/org/apache/yoko/orb etc.I like keeping the generated source separate so that when weone day getan IDL compiler, then we can generate all this properly. It would benice to eventually go there.thanks, Adi Sakala-----Original Message----- From: Kresten Krab Thorup [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, March 03, 2006 8:01 AM To: Alan D. Cabrera; Sakala, Adinarayana; [email protected] Subject: Initial tasks For some reason I'm not on yoko-dev. Sorry, but andersjust made meaware that there has been a discussion going on over the project structure. I have no intention of forcing structure to be something specific, but I am eager to get started on the other things that depend on having the structure decided. The structure that is in there now is as lised below, and I have reorganized the class spaces com.ooc -> org.apache.yoko.orb. trunk/orb [ all of the base orb from IONA ] src/main/ java generated-java src/test java generated-java The pom builds an artifact named yoko-orb-1.0-SNAPSHOT The unit tests need some reworking to be able to run in this new environment. What's in there is not JUnit; perhaps we canretrofitthe tests to use JUnit somehow. I added the extra "orb" at the end of the package name (org.apache.yoko.orb), because it would make a lot ofsense to haveadditional modules (all the corba services) in separateyoko modules.Also, I am thinking that there should be a parallel module (trunk/rmi) for the RMI/ValueHandle implementation thatwould buildyoko-rmi-1.0-SNAPSHOT. This really is a separate thing,and peoplecan choose to use this one or whatever comes with the JDK. Alan, can you have me added to the mailing list? Kresten Krab Thorup [EMAIL PROTECTED]
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
