Hi,

Does this package need to be compiled with java 1.4 or 1.5?

Right now it is being compiled using 1.5...

- Balaji

-----Original Message-----
From: Alexey Petrenko [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, September 12, 2006 2:23 PM
To: [email protected]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Location of javax.rmi package

Guys,

I've created javax.rmi implementation.
You can check it at YOKO-102 [1]

SY, Alexey

[1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YOKO-102

2006/9/12, Alexey Petrenko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Anders,
>
> Is there any updates in this topic? Have you started work on these
classes?
> I have a time to work on this now and can do this task.
>
> As far as I understood we agreed to include these classes into Yoko in
> separate jar. In the same jar with rmi implementations. Right?
>
> SY, Alexey
>
> 2006/8/16, Geir Magnusson Jr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> >
> >
> > Mosur Ravi, Balaji wrote:
> > > I am a bit confused... Again, are we talking about overriding just
the
> > > javax.rmi.CORBA implementation of the JRE with our own
implementation?
> >
> > Well, the problem is that you don't need it, we do (Harmony).  So I
> > agree, a separate jar would be better.
> >
> > geir
> >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Then the users of Yoko, can either choose to use the
java.endorsed.dirs
> > > option or the property javax.rmi.CORBA.PortableRemoteObjectClass
> > > whichever makes sense...
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > For clarity I would think of putting the implementation in a
separate
> > > jar & not in yoko-spec-corba.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > - Balaji
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Alexey Petrenko [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > Sent: Wednesday, August 16, 2006 3:19 AM
> > > To: [email protected]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > Subject: Re: Location of javax.rmi package
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > So that's what I'm talking about...
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > User adds CORBA implementation and receives new implementations of
> > >
> > > javax.rmi with it. Which overrides javax.rmi from the JRE.
> > >
> > > And this can mislead people...
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > SY, Alxey
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > 2006/8/16, Anders Hessellund Jensen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > >
> > >>> Separate jar for javax.rmi?
> > >
> > >
> > >> I thought about putting it into the yoko-spec-corba jar along
with the
> > >
> > >> org.omg classes.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
>
>
> --
> Alexey A. Petrenko
> Intel Middleware Products Division
>


-- 
Alexey A. Petrenko
Intel Middleware Products Division

Reply via email to