Hi Armin,

don't take me wrong, but if I were a woman I would love to have a child of 
you!!! :-DDDDD

You're a amazing!  

Thanks a million. ;-)


----------------------------------------
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> To: yoper-dev@lists.yoper.com
> Date: Mon, 24 Dec 2007 12:21:47 +1300
> Subject: Re: [yoper-dev] The 755 issue is back!
> 
> Hi Carlos!
> 
> It might be back, but not for long. I wrote a simple shell script currently 
> crawling through 3.1-rocketfuel and fixing all spec files and triggering a 
> rebuild. This problem should be sorted out in a few hours.
> 
> Regards
> 
> Armin
> 
> On Monday 24 December 2007 21:43:42 Carlos López wrote:
>> Hi guys,
>>
>> this email is intended to draw attention to all packages regarding the
>> well-known 755 bug in %files section. For those that don't knkow I what I
>> mean yet, you should know that the original Yoper 3.0 build template had a
>> bug: %files
>> %defattr(755,root,root)
>>
>> while  it should be:
>> %files
>> %defattr(-,root,root)
>>
>> I've been (yes, again!) keeping  an eye on the new builds for Yoper 3.1
>> and, unfortunately, I still see that not enough attention is being paid on
>> fixing this issue. In my humble opinion, we should center more in quality
>> that quantity and carry on this way is a bit neglecting. Thus, please,
>> BEFORE SUBMITTING any package have look at the %files section and MAKE SURE
>> THE PERMISSION VALUE IS RIGHT! It will only take 1second of your valuable
>> time being quite litle effort to remove this bug once forever.
>>
>> Next you have a few of the latest packages having this bug:
>>
>> http://88.198.41.209/build/yoper-3.1-rocketfuel/libkexiv2-0.1.6-6._yoper_3.
>>1_rocketfuel_/libkexiv2.spec
>> http://88.198.41.209/build/yoper-3.1-rocketfuel/digikam-0.9.3-12._yoper_3.1
>>_rocketfuel_/digikam.spec
>> http://88.198.41.209/build/yoper-3.1-rocketfuel/fluxbox-1.0.0-2._yoper_3.1_
>>rocketfuel_/fluxbox.spec
>> http://88.198.41.209/build/yoper-3.1-rocketfuel/xfmedia-0.9.2-5._yoper_3.1_
>>rocketfuel_/xfmedia.spec
>>
>> I do not really care who did submit the packages, this is not the important
>> thing, just that everyone (including myself), must pay attention to this.
>> Although it isn't a critical issue, it still opens a insecurity vector.
>> Thus, please, I beg you all consider these words in future submissions.
>>
>> I hope anyone takes it amiss, as threre is nothing further from my
>> intention. We just have problem that needs a collaborative solution; that's
>> all.
>>
>> Best regards and Merry Christmas to everyone!
>> Carlos. :-)
>> _________________________________________________________________
>> MSN Video.
>> http://video.msn.com/?mkt=es-es
>> _______________________________________________
>> yoper-dev mailing list
>> yoper-dev@lists.yoper.com
>> http://lists.frank-hosting.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/yoper-dev
> _______________________________________________
> yoper-dev mailing list
> yoper-dev@lists.yoper.com
> http://lists.frank-hosting.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/yoper-dev

_________________________________________________________________
MSN Noticias
http://noticias.msn.es/comunidad.aspx
_______________________________________________
yoper-dev mailing list
yoper-dev@lists.yoper.com
http://lists.frank-hosting.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/yoper-dev

Reply via email to