On Mon, 2007-01-29 at 11:35 -0500, James Bowes wrote: > Jeremy Katz wrote: > > Do we really want to be making a change like this in a stable release? > > It feels like a pretty big compatibility break to me and definitely not > > the sort of thing that makes sense for 3.0.x. > > > > Potentially _supporting_ the new locations in addition as well is > > sensible, but changing the default just feels like it's going to break > > things. Think about, eg, repositories that ship a package with a repo > > config file -- now where do they put it? It depends on if they're using > > yum 3.0.3 or 3.0.4. > > I think that makes more sense to me; I may have just misinterpreted the > TODO item. If the consensus is to simply support the new locations, then > all that really needs to be modified from this commit is to revert the > docs, spec, and Makefile changes, which I can do tonight. >
my comments were on irc - in short: 3.0.X: support the new location, default to the old location HEAD: support the old location, default to the new location that way we don't break people just for kicks. -sv _______________________________________________ Yum-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.dulug.duke.edu/mailman/listinfo/yum-devel
