On Mon, 2007-02-12 at 18:06 -0500, James Bowes wrote: > Hi all: > > This patch is pretty trivial; I'm sending it to the list, however, > because I'm not sure it's more correct than the existing code. This is a > form vs function thing, namely do we print out all the details of the > transaction, possibly causing the line to wrap, or do we truncate the > text to keep things pretty? > > Current: > > firefox-devel i386 1.5.0.9-3.fc6 updates 3.1 M > frysk i686 0.0.1.2007.02.07.rh1-1.fc6 updates > 6.9 M > gd i386 2.0.33-10.fc6 updates 155 k > > With Patch: > > firefox-devel i386 1.5.0.9-3.fc6 updates 3.1 M > frysk i686 0.0.1.2007.02.07.rh updates 6.9 M > gd i386 2.0.33-10.fc6 updates 155 k > > > So to make things pretty, you might end up losing part of a very long evr > string, or package name. I think you'd still get all the important > information, > however. > > So, what do people think? > > -James > > PS this is busy work I made for myself while Jeremy was doing awesome > depsolver work
so this is the one place where we didn't truncate b/c people felt like they really wanted to know what was going to happen on their systems, line-wrapping be damned. and I can sorta see their point. -sv _______________________________________________ Yum-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.dulug.duke.edu/mailman/listinfo/yum-devel
