On Sun, 2007-04-01 at 12:59 -0400, James Bowes wrote: > I'm pretty sure the attached patch doesn't change any behaviour, but I > wanted to get some more eyes looking at it before I checked it in, just > in case. > > Anyone think its broken?
Yes :-) This makes it so that we don't ensure that the package in the rpmdb/tsinfo actually matches the requirements of the package being checked. The fact that the requirement names match isn't enough Jeremy _______________________________________________ Yum-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.dulug.duke.edu/mailman/listinfo/yum-devel
