On Wed, 2007-05-16 at 09:57 -0400, Jeremy Katz wrote: > On Wed, 2007-05-16 at 09:23 -0400, seth vidal wrote: > > I know we still have an outstanding problem with presto, iirc, > > This one is > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=236512 for anyone > else who wants to take a look. I keep looking at it and then keeping > hitting a wall where things don't work even if things look promising > up-front.
Okay, this makes me cringe quite a bit given the potential for large impact and general gross-ness of some of it, but it does seem to work. Basic idea is that we move the repo setup into the RepoStorage object instead of the YumBase object. Sadly, this requires having access to yumbase from the repostorage, but I see no real way around that. And we end up kicking off the real repo setup when either a) someone explicitly calls YumBase.doRepoSetup() b) we go to populate package sacks based on the repos. In some (light at this point) testing, everything seems to work but if I didn't break anything, I'll be shocked. Thoughts, comments, other ideas? Jeremy _______________________________________________ Yum-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.dulug.duke.edu/mailman/listinfo/yum-devel
