On Wed, 2007-06-06 at 11:34 +0200, Florian Festi wrote: > Jeremy Katz wrote: > > On Tue, 2007-06-05 at 13:22 +0200, Florian Festi wrote: > >> * adjusted interface of PackageSackBase.matchPackageNames() > >> to other Sacks > >> * Does this break anything? > > > > This should be safe. Or if it's not, it's already going to be breaking > > things :) But it's been like this since 3.0.x, so probably fine > > Needed to allow PackageSackBase being part of a MetaSack. Patch attached
This looks good to me; as I said, PackageSackBase doesn't match any of the other PackageSacks and hasn't for quite a while so I don't think anything was depending on the case matching. Other opinions? The other way to go would be to add case matching to all of the matching... Jeremy _______________________________________________ Yum-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.dulug.duke.edu/mailman/listinfo/yum-devel
