Hi!
While I would prefer to have one single Sack API that can be consistently
used throughout the whole code base, I guess I just add the installed()
method to a new TestRpmSack class which will be a direct subclass of
PackageSack. While duplicating classes for the test frame work introduces
space for additional errors (that might hide errors in the code base) this
is probably the easiest thing to do right now and this additional method
shouldn't kill someone. We can then discuss any API changes without any hurry.
Any objections?
Florian
_______________________________________________
Yum-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.dulug.duke.edu/mailman/listinfo/yum-devel
