On Tue, 2007-10-09 at 21:28 -0400, James Antill wrote: > On Tue, 2007-10-09 at 20:52 -0400, seth vidal wrote: > > On Tue, 2007-10-09 at 20:43 -0400, Jeremy Katz wrote: > > > foo.noarch won't obsolete bar.i386 only if there's also a foo.i386. Now > > > for dinner. > > > > so isn't this a non-starter, then? If we don't let noarch ->arch and > > arch->noarch obsoletes then we'll be regressing vs current behavior. > > I think Jeremy's explanation had too many negatives:
okay - I got it now. Thank you. -sv _______________________________________________ Yum-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.dulug.duke.edu/mailman/listinfo/yum-devel
