seth vidal wrote:
On Tue, 2007-10-16 at 17:02 +0200, Florian Festi wrote:
In general, I'm getting the hang of the tests you've been submitting and
figuring out where/what we're missing. Good. I'm not so keen on the:
ii386 and ix86_64 syntax, or onoarch.
it's a good deal confusing to read. I realize it is probably for brevity
reasons but if we want to understand this later I think it might be good
to make it a bit more verbose.
Yeah, the package names are a bit short, most likely a bit too short. But I
didn't want to invest too many key presses while still figuring out how the
test must look like. Now that things settle down I should go over the tests
with query/replace to make them human reconcilable...
Florian
_______________________________________________
Yum-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.dulug.duke.edu/mailman/listinfo/yum-devel
