seth vidal wrote:
On Fri, 2008-01-11 at 12:59 +0100, Tim Lauridsen wrote:
I have created a patch str(po) look like this
foo-1.0-1.fc8.noarch
instead of
foo - 1.0-1.fc8.noarch
It will look better in many cases and print an yum package object will
have the look as 'rpm -q foo'
Let me here what you think.
where you insert the epoch in your patch will cause parsing problems if
someone cuts and pastes it.
what about using?
e:n-v-r.a ?
-sv
_______________________________________________
Yum-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.dulug.duke.edu/mailman/listinfo/yum-devel
I will do that
Tim
_______________________________________________
Yum-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.dulug.duke.edu/mailman/listinfo/yum-devel