seth vidal wrote:
On Fri, 2008-01-11 at 12:59 +0100, Tim Lauridsen wrote:
I have created a patch str(po) look like this
foo-1.0-1.fc8.noarch

instead of
foo - 1.0-1.fc8.noarch

It will look better in many cases and print an yum package object will have the look as 'rpm -q foo'

Let me here what you think.

where you insert the epoch in your patch will cause parsing problems if
someone cuts and pastes it.

what about using?

e:n-v-r.a ?

-sv


_______________________________________________
Yum-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.dulug.duke.edu/mailman/listinfo/yum-devel

I will do that

Tim
_______________________________________________
Yum-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.dulug.duke.edu/mailman/listinfo/yum-devel

Reply via email to