On Fri, 18 Jan 2008 10:15:18 -0500
seth vidal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Done. I checked the new repodiff into git last night. You can find it
> here:
> http://devel.linux.duke.edu/gitweb/?p=yum-utils.git;a=blob;f=repodiff.py;h=79383897ffec4e6e502d526abe418b8abf3f3685;hb=eea69d48eaa8f0e71b416d63b858b9b096dd9c55
> 
> it does just what you suggested. Give it some tests, make sure I
> didn't break anything obvious in the logic. It passed all my tests

Something came up in a meeting today that would be handy.

When listing the removals, it might be good to list of they've been
obsoleted by something new.  Not sure what the code would look like for
that though...

-- 
Jesse Keating
Fedora -- All my bits are free, are yours?

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

_______________________________________________
Yum-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.dulug.duke.edu/mailman/listinfo/yum-devel

Reply via email to