James Antill wrote:
On Sun, 2008-02-03 at 14:19 +0100, Tim Lauridsen wrote:
Today if you run the attached test script, you will get this output.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] yum]$ sudo python ~/yum-repr-test.py
[<yum.packages.YumInstalledPackage object at 0xb73c56c>]
[<yum.sqlitesack.YumAvailablePackageSqlite object at 0xb73dbcc>]
after adding the attached patch you will get this output.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] yum]$ cp ~/yum-repr-test.py .
[EMAIL PROTECTED] yum]$ sudo python ./yum-repr-test.py
[<Installed Package : yumex-2.0.3-2.fc8.noarch >]
[<Available Package : yumex-2.0.3-2.fc8.noarch (updates) >]
much more informative, very useful wen debugging yum and running in the
interactive python console.
Anybody have any objections to adding this patch.
Not an objection as such, but could you add id() as well, just so we
can guarantee uniqueness.
No problem, but why ?
is <Available Package : yumex-2.0.3-2.fc8.noarch (updates) > not unigue ??
Tim .
_______________________________________________
Yum-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.dulug.duke.edu/mailman/listinfo/yum-devel
