On Tue, 2008-07-22 at 12:46 -0400, James Antill wrote:
> I have 4 branches which might be worth putting in for 3.2.18, everyone
> may or maynot have looked at them before and they aren't "obviously
> simple/wonderful" enough I've just committed them, so I'll just list
> them and you can tell me what you think...
>
> * _quickWhatProvides
> group_pc
> repo-sacks
> repomd-checksums
>
> _quickWhatProvides
>
> The idea with this is when we get a provider of a requirement, when we
> do the next requirement we check to see if the previous provider has it.
> I think this is valid, and won't change anything ... but I'm not 100%.
> Doing this speeds up matches where you have pkgA with _lots_ of deps. on
> pkgB (the kernel people want to do this kind of thing).
This one looks like it is worth a shot, but just from a little thinking
it sure seems like it'll hurt us with non %{isa} deps/provs and
multilib. It might not hurt us badly but somewhat.
check it in and we can see if it eats things.
-sv
_______________________________________________
Yum-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.dulug.duke.edu/mailman/listinfo/yum-devel
