On Wed, 12 Aug 2009, Seth Vidal wrote:
On Tue, 11 Aug 2009, James Antill wrote:
I agree this "works", however the problem is that we rely on the
obsoletes data which is built up before we do anything based on looking
at just what is in the repos. So if we have local pkgs:
pkg-new-A
pkgA
...and pkg-new-A obs pkgA, then doing either of:
yum install pkgA.rpm pkg-new-A.rpm
yum install pkg-new-A.rpm pkgA.rpm
But installing pkg-A and pkg-new-A can be completely consistent and not
conflicting at all. Especially from local pkgs.
A comment is fine but I'm not going to chase down a bunch of rabbit holes
unless we have a case where this is unhappy.
Commented and I also tested the above with rpm and obsoleting (but not
conflicting) packages. both pkgs get installed with rpm -Uvh - the
obsoleting one alone isn't installed. I found that curious.
I'll post new patches of both.
-sv
_______________________________________________
Yum-devel mailing list
Yum-devel@lists.baseurl.org
http://lists.baseurl.org/mailman/listinfo/yum-devel
