On Thursday 08 October 2009, Ville Skyttä wrote: > On Thursday 08 October 2009, James Antill wrote: > > On Thu, 2009-10-08 at 00:11 +0300, Ville Skyttä wrote: > > > On Friday 02 October 2009, Ville Skyttä wrote: > > > > Hello, > > > > > > > > As someone mentioned Python 3 here and on fedora-devel... here's a > > > > small patch that gets metadata entries' has_key() out of the way of > > > > further has_key() related changes. > > > > > > > > So when previously one would do "entry.has_key(foo)", after this one > > > > should do "foo in entry" instead. > > > > > > Any comments? > > > > We know we have to do this eventually, as the giant py3k suckage moves > > towards us. I'm not sure we want to do it before 3.2.25 is released > > though ... and we should really do a lot of it at once (see: git grep > > has_key). > > Yes, that's pretty much the whole point of this patch: it gets the only > instance of has_key() that can't be trivially changed to "in" or something > else out of the way so the rest can be safely grepped and done at once. I > have patches taking care of that as well, and I plan to start submitting > them once this is in.
Now that 3.2.25 is out, could I get some more comments about this patch (e.g. good to go in, or should be abandoned until it's time to address all has_key things, ...)? _______________________________________________ Yum-devel mailing list Yum-devel@lists.baseurl.org http://lists.baseurl.org/mailman/listinfo/yum-devel
