On Wed, Feb 03 2010 at 4:04pm -0500, Chris Ball <c...@laptop.org> wrote:
> Hi Mike, > > > It is my hope that these changes can still make F13 as part of > > the "System Rollback" feature. The existing project Feature page > > could be extended to include LVM snapshot information: > > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/SystemRollbackWithBtrfs > > Sounds fine to me. What steps should we be taking now? For starters we need to get rawhide's yum-utils updated to include the latest fs-snapshot plugin updates that are now upstream. Who should update the SystemRollbackWithBtrfs page? Or should we create a new SystemRollbackWithLvm page that is linked to from SystemRollbackWithBtrfs? > It'd be good to have your input on the gnome-disk-utility UI for > snapshots too, now that we'll have more than one user for it -- we're > discussing at: > > https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=608204 > http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=26258 I'm open to helping answer any questions David might have, and making any lvm changes needed to assist his effort, once he has time to look at gnome-disk-utility's snapshot integration (via lvm and btrfs). It would be nice if gnome-disk-utility knew to treat LVM snapshot LVs that have a "yum_<date>" tag as being part of a "system rollback point" or some such. But I'm not sure of the best way for David to programatically (or via lvm utility) access a snapshot LV's lvm tag(s). A stop-gap would be to just rely on the suffix of the LV name to end with: "_yum_<date>" (but that is fairly crude!) Mike _______________________________________________ Yum-devel mailing list Yum-devel@lists.baseurl.org http://lists.baseurl.org/mailman/listinfo/yum-devel
