On Mon, 2010-09-27 at 22:17 +0200, FlorianFesti wrote: > On 09/27/2010 08:53 PM, James Antill wrote: > > > > On my x86_64 desktop I get: > > > > # 2113 package names, 557 Leafs, 158 leftovers, 266 lines > > > > ...however I get a bunch of packages that don't exist (like -prctl in > > base), fixing that I get: > > > > # 2113 package names, 557 Leafs, 151 leftovers, 259 lines > Yes, this is a known bug/missing feature/still undecided behaviour. I > will probably add a cli switch for that. The point is that if the > package is in the comps file it might exist somewhere.
True, but I doubt that's more common than the repos. changing the comps. info to add something to a group. > > ...and 259 is a big improvement over 2k, but it's more than I thought it > > might be. Post patch my RHEL-5 server gives: > > > > # 205 package names, 57 Leafs, 43 leftovers, 54 lines > > > > ...which is even worse (only group is @base, and that has -9). > Yeah, it doesn't work that well on power users' machines where a lot of > stuff is customized. Th F14 on my laptop that got updated from F12 has > # 1858 package names, 441 Leafs, 140 leftovers, 237 lines *nods*, on my F-14 VM (which is pretty default, I think). I have: # 1247 package names, 332 Leafs, 90 leftovers, 135 lines ...which is about the same as my desktop (~50%) which is nice but still too big to be very useful, I think. I was hoping it'd output something in the 50 lines range. I wonder if we could use smolt data to create some more groups? I expected my minimal RHEL-5 server to be almost entirely a couple of groups :(. > Still it is only 13% of the original list. I hope to find some even > better numbers for more regularly installed systems. IMO you want to compare against the Leafs number, not the package names number, so it's 53% (which is still worthwhile, but...). _______________________________________________ Yum-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.baseurl.org/mailman/listinfo/yum-devel
