On Thu, 2011-09-22 at 10:00 -0400, Zdenek Pavlas wrote: > > I meant that traditionally to have packages "move arch" we had > > them obsolete older versions of themselves in their specfiles. > > Oh, now I see. That shouldn't hurt, but is it necessary? > > I feel this somewhat makes 'arch' part of the package name, > so it's no longer an update, but install + uninstall of obsoleted. > One shouldn't expect such things from 'yum update', IMO..
I guess it's rather a "make this special case explicit" and not the default. Nils -- Nils Philippsen "Those who would give up Essential Liberty to purchase Red Hat a little Temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty [email protected] nor Safety." -- Benjamin Franklin, 1759 PGP fingerprint: C4A8 9474 5C4C ADE3 2B8F 656D 47D8 9B65 6951 3011 _______________________________________________ Yum-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.baseurl.org/mailman/listinfo/yum-devel
