On Thu, 2012-08-02 at 15:57 +0200, Zdeněk Pavlas wrote: > If the repository 'foo-source' is enabled but there's no 'foo' repo, > don't disable 'foo-source'.
ACK, if you think this idea is best. But I'm not sure if we'd be better off just doing enables for -source here. Eg. given: foo | enabled foo-source | disabled bar | disabled bar-source | enabled nul | disabled nul-source | disabled baz-source | enabled snafu-source | disabled ...then our (sane :) options for --source are: 1. What we do now: disabled=foo,bar*,nul*,baz-source,snafu-source enabled=foo-source 2. What I think this patch does: disabled=foo,bar*,nul*,snafu-source enabled=foo-source,baz-source 3. Everything with *-source: disabled=foo,bar,nul enabled=foo-source,baz-source,bar-source,nul-source,snafu-source 4. Don't disable *-source, no matter what bin says, enable corresponding *-source for enabled bins: disabled=foo,bar,nul*,snafu-source enabled=foo-source,bar-source,baz-source ...and I think people would prefer #4 to #2 ... any other opinions? _______________________________________________ Yum-devel mailing list Yum-devel@lists.baseurl.org http://lists.baseurl.org/mailman/listinfo/yum-devel