-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 El Tue, 11 Sep 2012 21:19:37 +0300 Panu Matilainen <[email protected]> escribió: > On 09/11/2012 07:54 PM, Dennis Gilmore wrote: > > --- > > rpmUtils/arch.py | 6 ++---- > > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/rpmUtils/arch.py b/rpmUtils/arch.py > > index d560be0..8a53f74 100644 > > --- a/rpmUtils/arch.py > > +++ b/rpmUtils/arch.py > > @@ -73,8 +73,8 @@ arches = { > > "armv7hnl": "armv7hl", > > "armv7hl": "noarch", > > > > - # arm64 > > - "arm64": "noarch", > > + # aarch64 > > + "aarch64": "noarch", > > Hmm, which upstream would that be? At least a quick skim over Linus' > kernel tree didn't turn up any references to "aarch64" (or arm64 for > that matter). > > A name is of course just a name and we might not have a whole lot say > in it, but I can't help but thinking AARGH every time I see this > mentioned...
well the patches have been submitted to linus. I tried but was unable to convince them that arm64 was much better than aarch64 for the output of uname -m ill have some rpm patches soon also Dennis -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.18 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAlBX2fwACgkQkSxm47BaWfccXACcDVEvOCDVgYr1pR/g+clR2Lut kLwAnjgfFu1IfV6B8jUKOQKRgMZXmXdv =JIvF -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ Yum-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.baseurl.org/mailman/listinfo/yum-devel
