On Tue, 2012-11-20 at 09:21 -0800, Toshio Kuratomi wrote: > Tested this procedure on f17 and got the same. So it looks like in terms of > what libxml2 can handle, we can't read what it produces if we're dealing > with the C0 (ASCII) control codes.
Yeh, I thought that was nice of it too :). > libxml2 both reads and writes the C1 > control codes that are present in unicode but not ascii. > > Thoughts on continuing to ignore the C1 codes since libxml2 handles those? > (This option would mean that the patch is essentially done.) Given how much to_xml() is called in the createrepo code paths, then I'd vote that unless it's close to free we shouldn't bother. If it's in the 10-25% perf. hit, then I could be convinced that it's better to do it anyway. _______________________________________________ Yum-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.baseurl.org/mailman/listinfo/yum-devel
