On 2013-04-19 17:28, Zdenek Pavlas wrote: >> Using it in yum-utils is a matter of prepending "_xfunc yum " to all >> calls of functions that are in yum's. There are some examples of this in >> bash-completion itself. > > Is that any better than adding a one-liner at the top?
Cleaner IMO, upstream supported way, and one subshell + pkg-config invocation less. >> BTW if assuming presence of bash-completion >= 2.0 is acceptable, there >> are a few things that could be cleaned up. > > Not sure about this. Not sure what you're not sure of :), but if it's about >= 2.0 note that the one-liner your original patch adds will require >= 2.0 (well 1.99) anyway, the *.pc file didn't exist before that. _______________________________________________ Yum-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.baseurl.org/mailman/listinfo/yum-devel
