On Tue, Feb 19, 2019 at 08:28 -0600, Jonathan Siwek wrote: > we pick points in time as an "event" and associate various bits of > data with them, then users declare their interest in some subset of > that data. Most natural way for them to do that seems to be by naming > each bit of data. I agree with all of that in principle, but for me it would need a different syntax to become practical. The current syntax for events implies certain semantics just by being similar to so many other languages that don't do named-based matching for parameters. Robin -- Robin Sommer * Corelight, Inc. * ro...@corelight.com * www.corelight.com _______________________________________________ zeek-dev mailing list zeek-dev@zeek.org http://mailman.icsi.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/zeek-dev
- Re: [Zeek-Dev] support for event handlers using a sub... Robin Sommer
- Re: [Zeek-Dev] support for event handlers using a... Jon Siwek
- Re: [Zeek-Dev] support for event handlers usi... Seth Hall
- Re: [Zeek-Dev] support for event handlers... Vlad Grigorescu
- Re: [Zeek-Dev] support for event handlers... Jon Siwek
- Re: [Zeek-Dev] support for event handlers... Jan Grashöfer
- Re: [Zeek-Dev] support for event handlers... Vern Paxson
- Re: [Zeek-Dev] support for event handlers... Jon Siwek
- Re: [Zeek-Dev] support for event handlers... Vern Paxson
- Re: [Zeek-Dev] support for event handlers... Jon Siwek
- Re: [Zeek-Dev] support for event handlers... Robin Sommer
- Re: [Zeek-Dev] support for event handlers... Jon Siwek
- Re: [Zeek-Dev] support for event handlers... Robin Sommer
- Re: [Zeek-Dev] support for event handlers... Jon Siwek
- Re: [Zeek-Dev] support for event handlers using a subset o... Seth Hall