>> Suggestion: `zeekcl`, Zeek (Command-Line) CLlient. > > "zeekcl" is very close to "zeekctl", which could lead to confusion. > "zcl" maybe? > >> Is use of Python still desirable for other reasons? Otherwise, I >> lean >> towards `zeekcl` being C++. > > No particular preference from my side, I can see either. Effort is > probably about the same in this model, and C++ does have the advantage > of less dependency issues.
I agree - I actually kind of like the idea that zeekcl does not have python as a dependency. >> I plan to have `zeekcl` code/tests live inside the main Zeek repo. > > Makes sense to me as well. Agreed here too. Johanna _______________________________________________ Zeek-Dev mailing list Zeek-Dev@zeek.org http://mailman.icsi.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/zeek-dev
