My statement is intended to be simpler than that, just a statement of fact. An analogy: a cylinder projected onto one plane is a square; on a.nother plane, it is a circle. People will argue circle vs square, but they are not different. The cylinder is the cylinder.
On Mar 5, 2011 9:12 AM, "ED" <seacrofter...@yahoo.com> wrote: 'Samsara is no different than nirvana.' Yes, but only to the non-rational mind or no-mind. The neocortex/limbic_system which is the mind we normally reside in cannot perform that trick. My statement is a simple statement of fact, analogous to --ED --- In Zen_Forum@yahoogroups.com, ChrisAustinLane <chris@...> wrote: > Samsara is no different than nirvana. It is a matter of do you believe life is a seamless whole or ... Oh Oh, Chris, you have have given the insight-building ball of samsara on this forum another push! ;-) --ED Our current configuration of posters is jndeed very effective at generating a lot of words quickly! > > It is interesting to see the dynamics of different types of posting personalities interact. > ... *Similar to Bill but with some added on:* >> There are times in which while getting involved in a thread, it's very difficult for me to read ... Current Book Discussion: any Zen book that you recently have read or are reading! Talk about it t...
