Hi Siska, If that were true, then what wouldn't condemn you to 500 years as a fox? Mike
From: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> To: [email protected] Sent: Monday, 5 September 2011, 18:48 Subject: Re: [Zen] Fwd: Re: [Zen Living] Supreme Vehicle Hi Mike, > In other words, there is and there isn't a difference. I like this. Would statements implying there is or isn't a difference condemn you to 500 years as a fox too? :-) Siska From: mike brown <[email protected]> Sender: [email protected] Date: Mon, 5 Sep 2011 11:17:44 +0100 (BST) To: [email protected]<[email protected]> ReplyTo: [email protected] Subject: Re: [Zen] Fwd: Re: [Zen Living] Supreme Vehicle >In truth, Two and One are in support of one another. >>Here it seems that Rev Harvey makes distinction between Two and One. Are they >>really different at all? Siska, Just as Bill! is condemed to live 500 years as a fox for saying that an enlightened person isn't subject to karma (just as he would be if he said that an enlightened person is subject to karma), so with this question. There is no yes or no. In other words, there is and there isn't a difference. Mike
