Talk about judgemental thinking!
--- In [email protected], Kristopher Grey <kris@...> wrote:
>
> On 2/13/2012 3:30 AM, rewrisk wrote:
> >
> > Right thinking not discursive judgemental thinking?
> >
> Judgement is dividing/identifying/attaching some relative value system
> to this/that, self/other, yours/mine, right/wrong. From this arises
> perceptions of lack, desire for more/better/other, etc. This is the
> root, not the remedy.
If you knew you would not be arbitrarily discriminating?
>
> > All kinds of thinking have their proper place.
> >
> Thoughts arise naturally. No problem.
> >
> > No as Bill say's below it is the attachment that is the problem.
> >
> Yes. From the perspective that sees any of this as problematic.
> >
> > Attachment must occur for awareness to become cognition
> >
>
> Is that so? Cognition is not a problem.
You dont really know.
Do you?
> > but attachment must be abandoned for awareness to increase.
> >
> No need to abandon what is seen to be illusory.
Arguing semantics would indicate an instinctive need to compete
> >
> > It is a fine dance.
> >
> Discernment, not judgement.
It is not necessary for those who 'listen' to argue semantics.
>
> K
>
------------------------------------
Current Book Discussion: any Zen book that you recently have read or are
reading! Talk about it today!Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Zen_Forum/
<*> Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional
<*> To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Zen_Forum/join
(Yahoo! ID required)
<*> To change settings via email:
[email protected]
[email protected]
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[email protected]
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
