Same way your question arises.
KG
On 10/7/2012 5:25 PM, yonyon...@gmail.com wrote:
how?
yeongsoo
On 10/6/12, Kristopher Grey <k...@kgrey.com <mailto:kris%40kgrey.com>>
wrote:
> It appears so.
>
> KG
>
> On 10/6/2012 2:46 AM, yonyon...@gmail.com
<mailto:yonyonson%40gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> aren't appearances too, just THIS!? and hindrances for that matter?
>>
>> On 10/6/12, Kristopher Grey <k...@kgrey.com
<mailto:kris%40kgrey.com> <mailto:kris%40kgrey.com>>
>> wrote:
>> > "Self'/no-self', 'mind'/'no-mind' - such beliefs (or "opinions"
if you
>> > prefer to think personal attachments differ from personal expressions
>> > of
>> > them) are hindrances, but being 'empty' can only appear to hinder.
>> >
>> > So long as such stories are appealing, you will pursue them.
Doing so,
>> > one imagines the 'path' to appear long and narrow, and following it
>> > will
>> > appear to require great effort.
>> >
>> > Path defines self, self defines path. One in the same. All hindrances
>> > arise from thinking otherwise.
>> >
>> > KG
>> >
>> > On 10/6/2012 1:39 AM, Bill! wrote:
>> >>
>> >> The only hindrance to fully realizing Buddha Nature (IMO) is
clinging
>> >> to self...Bill!
>> >>
>> >> --- In Zen_Forum@yahoogroups.com
<mailto:Zen_Forum%40yahoogroups.com>
>> <mailto:Zen_Forum%40yahoogroups.com>
>> <mailto:Zen_Forum%40yahoogroups.com>,
>> >> Kristopher Grey <kris@...> wrote:
>> >> >
>> >> > On 10/6/2012 1:09 AM, billsmart wrote:
>> >> > > My practice is to continue to more completely bring no-mind
>> >> > > (Buddha
>> >> > > Nature) up off the cushion and more fully integrate it into my
>> >> daily life.
>> >> >
>> >> > Seeing 'no-mind' as being more or less 'Buddha Nature" than mind
>> is the
>> >> > only hindrance to realizing life as the integral expression of
this.
>> >> >
>> >> > Practice, wherever it may appear to lead, is non other than this,
>> >> > appearing as a form of expression.
>> >> >
>> >> > KG
>> >> >
>> >>
>> >>
>> >
>> >
>>
>>
>
>
