Bill,

Gosh Bill, I was going to jump but then I saw the splat when you hit the ground!

The other ghosts tell me you now finally understand my teachings on the reality 
of the world of forms!
:-)

Edgar



On Nov 30, 2012, at 8:02 PM, Bill! wrote:

> Joe,
> 
> I've long since given up trying to coax Edgar to take the leap off the 100-ft 
> pole. He is clinging to it with a vise-like grip of rationality.
> 
> The only reason I continue to 'spar' with him is to prevent him from 
> completely blocking others from climbing the poll by smearing it with his 
> slippery drips of logic and smears of understanding.
> 
> ...Bill! 
> 
> --- In Zen_Forum@yahoogroups.com, "Joe" <desert_woodworker@...> wrote:
> >
> > Edgar, Bill!,
> > 
> > That's true in zazen, as you say.
> > 
> > It's in AWAKENING, however, where Zen begins, and where the formless is 
> > actually experienced. This is the heart of zen and the central experience 
> > of zen practice. You must carry the practice at least as far as this to 
> > have the hope of the ghost of a prayer of communicating with others about 
> > it. I know you deny having experienced this but you are the exception, 
> > here; the others here I'm sure would love it if you knew what you were 
> > talking about. Don't you see that your head is a monkey-wrench in the 
> > works? And that's the only function you serve. You belong in Skeptics 
> > Anonymous, or on a Philosophy board, not here. In this regard, your 
> > delusions about Zen really do extend to delusions of adequacy, which is a 
> > pity and a pitiful sight. You bring reason, and no experience. Puffery! 
> > It's like trying to substitute something for Love, something for which 
> > there is no substitute. But in this case, reason and ideas cover the 
> > experience of emptiness for you. And that's self- and other- defeating. 
> > There is no Bodhisattva-work in YOUR career! You have to get on with 
> > things, by dropping everything. After awakening, and within awakening, pick 
> > up, freshly, what's important; one inevitably does this. That is called 
> > "Skilful Means", and the development of skilful means. It's simple, and it 
> > s natural. It is not done by reason, ever.
> > 
> > End of lecture!
> > 
> > You won't find it here.
> > 
> > I know you agree! ;-)
> > 
> > And for the wrong "reasons"; perfectly typical, again. You have no "known" 
> > way out of the straight-jacket.
> > 
> > For some patients, the only cure for them is to let them OUT of the jacket. 
> > That is my only prescription for you. I say you don't BELONG locked-up. 
> > Your self-imposed imprisonment is the only thing that has MADE you crazy, 
> > and which is keeping you that way. But in your padded cell, with arms 
> > immobilized, you do the MOST harm to others. Thus, it is our duty to urge 
> > you to "Wake Up"!
> > 
> > Bill!, ...no one can say we're not pushing against an unmovable illusion 
> > keeping this fellow from taking a step from the Hundred Foot Pole! But no 
> > one can remove the stumbling block for him, up there. That's why Zen 
> > practice, and Awakening, is a personal thing, which must be experienced: 
> > it's not book-l'arnin', nor grinding the gears of ratiocination. It cannot 
> > be appreciated from the outside. And it is un-imaginable.
> > 
> > The comic-book-phase has never ended for you, Edgar. It's only morphed to 
> > "illustrated novels". Yes, it's what the Market can push, now. But it's not 
> > for you.
> > 
> > Sorry, Edgar, but all True.
> > 
> > Take a look; Get a clue.
> > 
> > --Joe
> > 
> > > Edgar Owen <edgarowen@> wrote:
> > >
> > > Bill,
> > > 
> > > It is impossible to directly experience the formless because it has no 
> > > characteristics whatsoever. In zazen one only experiences the RELATIVELY 
> > > formless with fewer forms arising. It's an illusion to claim that's 
> > > absolute formlessness. It's a Zen cliche which simply isn't true.
> >
> 
> 

Reply via email to