Hi Werner, I remember that we wrote about the same issue in the past, you
have a look to this archived post:
http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.web.zenloadbalancer.user/267
I hope this help you.
2012/10/30 Werner Hauptfleisch <[email protected]>
> Hi Everyone,
>
> Does anyone have any feedback on the this item or is there additional
> information required from me to bring this to a conclusion?
>
> Regards
>
> On 10/25/2012 05:07 PM, Werner Hauptfleisch wrote:
>
> HI Emilio,
>
> My apologies - you are correct. That section should rather read:
>
> <SNIP>
>
> My test configuration is simple:
> 192.168.0.10 - the Load Balancer virtual IP accepting connections on port
> 80
> 192.168.0.11 - Active Web Server 1 accepting connections on port 80
> 192.168.0.12 - Passive Web Server 2 accepting connections on port 80
> (should -only be accessed when server 1 fails)
>
> The configuration used for my test server farm:
> - Profile: TCP
> - Server 0: 192.168.0.11, Port 80, Weight: 0, Priority: 1
> - Server 1: 192.168.0.12, Port 80, Weight: 0, Priority: 2
>
> <SNIP>
>
> Thanks for noting that!
>
> On 10/25/2012 04:54 PM, Emilio Campos wrote:
>
> Server0 and Server1 have the same ip and same port. Is it a mistake
> writing the mail ?
>
> Regards
>
> 2012/10/25 Werner Hauptfleisch <[email protected]>
>
>> Hi Everyone,
>>
>> I have been working with Zen Load Balancer (V.2, latest stable release)
>> and have been trying to configure a simple server farm to allow for the use
>> of an active-passive cluster environment. According to the administration
>> guide offered on-line, 'Priority' is the suggested algorithm to use in my
>> server farm, quoted:
>>
>> "Priority – connections to the highest priority available. Balance all
>> connections to the same highest priority server. If this server is down,
>> the connections switch to the next highest server. With this algorithm you
>> can build an Active-Passive cluster service with several real servers."
>>
>> Based on my readings and logical thinking, I have also disabled the
>> "Enable client ip address persistence through memory" setting in the
>> profile options.
>>
>> My test configuration is simple:
>> 192.168.0.10 - the Load Balancer virtual IP accepting connections on port
>> 80
>> 192.168.0.11 - Active Web Server 1 accepting connections on port 80
>> 192.168.0.12 - Passive Web Server 2 accepting connections on port 80
>> (should -only be accessed when server 1 fails)
>>
>> The configuration used for my test server farm:
>> - Profile: TCP
>> - Server 0: 192.168.0.11, Port 80, Weight: 0, Priority: 1
>> - Server 1: 192.168.0.11, Port 80, Weight: 0, Priority: 2
>>
>> When running some tests on the configuration I do not get the desired
>> results. I would expect all connections to be sent to one of the servers,
>> and only when the active server stops listing will connections be sent to
>> server 2. Instead, I can see connections to both servers, very similar to
>> 'round-robin' or 'weighted' algorithms?
>>
>> Initially I also created a server farm using the HTTP profile, but I note
>> that the 'Priority' algorithm is not available, hence my resultant use of
>> the TCP profile for my test farm.
>>
>> I have also configured and attempted to test the same setup using V.3 of
>> Zen Load Balancer, but the results are the same. (I also note some bugs in
>> V.3 which is expected as this is still a release candidate anyway :) )
>>
>> Does someone perhaps have some pointers that I can follow in getting my
>> server farm to work as described above, or am I attempting to achieve
>> something that Zen Load Balancer does not support?
>>
>> Many thanks for your responses and help.
>>
>> W ;)
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> Everyone hates slow websites. So do we.
>> Make your web apps faster with AppDynamics
>> Download AppDynamics Lite for free today:
>> http://p.sf.net/sfu/appdyn_sfd2d_oct
>> _______________________________________________
>> Zenloadbalancer-support mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/zenloadbalancer-support
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Load balancer distribution - Open Source Project
> http://www.zenloadbalancer.com
> Distribution list (subscribe):
> [email protected]
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Everyone hates slow websites. So do we.
> Make your web apps faster with AppDynamics
> Download AppDynamics Lite for free today:
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/appdyn_sfd2d_oct
> _______________________________________________
> Zenloadbalancer-support mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/zenloadbalancer-support
>
>
--
Load balancer distribution - Open Source Project
http://www.zenloadbalancer.com
Distribution list (subscribe): [email protected]
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Everyone hates slow websites. So do we.
Make your web apps faster with AppDynamics
Download AppDynamics Lite for free today:
http://p.sf.net/sfu/appdyn_sfd2d_oct
_______________________________________________
Zenloadbalancer-support mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/zenloadbalancer-support
