-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Tiago,

We did the SSL session binding code for LVS back in like 2002 or so
(not sure anymore) and I would personally use LVS normally. However, I
find myself currently in a situation where a GUI is needed and LVS is
kinda short on one.

I read that ZLB has support for DR/DSR and was looking at the Farm
setting in the new 3.x version and other than 3 Profile types not
listed in the ZLB Documentation (L4TxNAT, L4UxNAT, Datalink) I have
yet to find any further information regarding DR/DSR support in ZLB.

Have you had any luck with this?

Thank you,
Chuck

On 06/26/2013 10:21 PM, Tiago Soares - Netmaker wrote:
> Robert,
> 
> I'm asking because in an environment that if I have a lot of
> traffic incoming to my website and I have my backends (webservers)
> behind the loadbalancer, the loadbalancer itself can became a
> bottleneck. Do you agree?
> 
> Like in LVS (linux virtual server), they have an "Direct Route"
> mode that incoming traffic goes thru loadbalancer, but the backends
> respond directly to client.
> 
> Regards.
> 
> *NetMaker . Governança em TI*
> 
> *GOI . Gerência de Operações e Infraestrutura*
> 
> Tiago Barros Soares (21) 3257.5757 [email protected] 
> www.netmaker.com.br
> 
> 
> Em 26-06-2013 16:47, Rob Baxter escreveu:
>> No. The default configuration as far as i know is that traffic is
>> "relayed" too and from your Loadbalancer.
>> 
>> Https requires this to maintain the chain. Also...  it's not
>> standard procedure for a web server to reply to x-forwarded-for
>> addressing.
>> 
>> So in short, no it's not. Now that's not to say there may be a
>> work around. But that would mean loosing a boat load of benefits.
>> The foremost of which is perimeter security of your back end
>> systems.
>> 
>> Don't quote me on any of this "i'm a beginner myself". Maybe
>> someone else will confirm / correct me. But im 99% sure in not
>> speaking total trash! :D
>> 
>> Regards,
>> 
>> Robert Baxter Network Manager 01462 432009
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> ________________________________________ From: Tiago Soares -
>> Netmaker [[email protected]] Sent: 26 June 2013 19:35 
>> To: [email protected] Subject:
>> [Zenloadbalancer-support] X-Forwarded-For - Direct route
>> 
>> Hi,
>> 
>> Enabling "X-Forwarded-For" header will my backend web servers
>> respond directly to client, instead of send to load balance and
>> then to client?
>> 
>> Thank you!
>> 
>> -- Att. Tiago Barros Soares
>> 
>> 
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> 
This SF.net email is sponsored by Windows:
>> 
>> Build for Windows Store.
>> 
>> http://p.sf.net/sfu/windows-dev2dev 
>> _______________________________________________ 
>> Zenloadbalancer-support mailing list 
>> [email protected] 
>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/zenloadbalancer-support
>>
>> 
MAILSERVER NOTICE: This message contains confidential information and is
intended only for the individual named. Kingshott accepts no liability
for the content of this email, or for the consequences of any actions
taken on the basis of the information provided. Please note that any
views or opinions presented in this email are solely those of the author
and do not necessarily represent those of the Kingshott School. If you
are not the named addressee you should not disseminate, distribute or
copy this e-mail. If you are not the intended recipient you are notified
that disclosing, copying, distributing or taking any action in reliance
on the contents of this information is strictly prohibited. If you have
received this email in error please notify the system manager or the
sender immediately and delete this e-mail from your system. E-mail
transmission cannot be guaranteed to be secure or error-free as
information could be intercepted, corrupted, lost, destroyed, arrive late or
>> incomplete, or contain viruses. The sender therefore does not
>> accept liability for any errors or omissions in the contents of
>> this message or any damage caused by any virus, which arise as a
>> result of e-mail transmission. The recipient should check this
>> email and any attachments for the presence of viruses.
>> 
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> 
This SF.net email is sponsored by Windows:
>> 
>> Build for Windows Store.
>> 
>> http://p.sf.net/sfu/windows-dev2dev 
>> _______________________________________________ 
>> Zenloadbalancer-support mailing list 
>> [email protected] 
>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/zenloadbalancer-support
>>
>
>> 
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> 
This SF.net email is sponsored by Windows:
> 
> Build for Windows Store.
> 
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/windows-dev2dev 
> _______________________________________________ 
> Zenloadbalancer-support mailing list 
> [email protected] 
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/zenloadbalancer-support
>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with undefined - http://www.enigmail.net/

iEYEARECAAYFAlIuzWAACgkQIUUjp07y+ZZS9QCdF38+sHcRFb6Gg4Bz89hQFgXy
4VEAoMoN3U8Snnbbugf9dCyqrXgkSGRt
=BZX5
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
How ServiceNow helps IT people transform IT departments:
1. Consolidate legacy IT systems to a single system of record for IT
2. Standardize and globalize service processes across IT
3. Implement zero-touch automation to replace manual, redundant tasks
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=51271111&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
_______________________________________________
Zenloadbalancer-support mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/zenloadbalancer-support

Reply via email to